|
Multiple Intelligences in the structure of a new English syllabus for secondary schoolGardner defines intelligence as "the capacity to solve problems or to fashion product that are valued in one or more cultural setting". Using biological as well as cultural research, he formulated a list of seven intelligences. This new outlook on intelligence differs greatly from the traditional view which usually recognizes only two intelligences, verbal and computational. The seven intelligences Gardner defines are: 2.1.1 Linguistic Intelligence Linguistic intelligence (or verbal-linguistic) is the ability to use with clarity the core operations of language. It involves having a mastery of language. This intelligence includes the ability to effectively manipulate language to express oneself rhetorically or poetically. It also allows one to use language as a means to remember information. People with linguistic
intelligence have a sensitivity to the meaning of words--the capacity to follow
rules of grammar, and, on carefully selected occasions, to violate them. At a
somewhat more sensory level--a sensitivity to the sounds, rhythms, inflections,
and meters of words--that ability which can make even poetry in a foreign
tongue beautiful to hear. And a sensitivity to the different functions of
language--its potential to excite, convince, stimulate, convey information, or
simply to please. 2.1.2 Logical-Mathematical Intelligence Logical-Mathematical intelligence is logical and mathematical ability as well as scientific ability. It consists of the ability to detect patterns, reason deductively and think logically. This intelligence is most often associated with scientific and mathematical thinking. Abstraction is fundamental, reasoning is complex, and problem-solution is natural. Order and sequence are
significant. There is a drive to know causality as well as the explication of
existence. 2.1.3 Intra-Personal Intelligence Intra-Personal intelligence is the ability to form an accurate model of oneself, and to use that model to operate effectively in life. At a basic level, it is the capacity to distinguish feelings of pleasure from emotional pain and , on the basis of such discrimination, to become more involved in or to withdraw from a situation. At the most advanced level, interpersonal intelligence is the capacity to detect and to symbolize complex and high
differentiated sets of feelings. 2.1.4 Inter-Personal Intelligence Inter-personal intelligence is the ability to notice and make distinctions among other individuals and, in particular, among their moods, temperaments, motivations, and intentions. Examined in its most elementary form, the inter-personal intelligence entails the capacity of the young child to detect and discriminate the various moods of those around them. In an
advanced form, it permits a skilled adult to read the intentions and
desires--even when those desires have been hidden--of many other individuals
and, potentially, act upon this knowledge. The last two intelligences are separate from each other. Nevertheless, because of their close association in most cultures, they are often linked together. 2.1.5 Musical Intelligence Musical intelligence (or Musical-rhythmic) is the ability to use the core set of musical elements--pitch, rhythm, and timbre (understanding the characteristic qualities of a tone). Auditory functions are required for a person to develop this intelligence in relation to pitch and tone, but it is not needed for the knowledge of rhythm. There may be a hierarchy of difficulty involved in various roles--composition, performance, listening. People such as singers, composers, instrumentalists, conductors, and those who enjoy, understand, use, create, perform, and appreciate music and/or elements of music may exhibit developed musical intelligence. 2.1.6 Spatial Intelligence Spatial intelligence (or visual-spatial) is the capacity to perceive the world accurately, and to be able to recreate one's visual experience. It gives one the ability to manipulate and create mental images in order to solve problems. This intelligence is not limited to visual domains--Gardner notes that spatial intelligence is also formed in blind children. It entails a number of loosely related capacities: the ability to recognize instances of the same element; the ability to recognize transformations of one element in another; the
capacity to conjure up mental imagery and then to transform that imagery; the
ability to produce a graphic likeness of spatial information; and the like. A
person with a good sense of direction or the ability to move and operate well
in the world would indicate spatial intelligence. 2.1.7 Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence Bodily-Kinesthetic
intelligence is the ability to use one's mental abilities to coordinate one's
own bodily movements and the ability to handle objects skillfully. This
intelligence challenges the popular belief that mental and physical activity
are unrelated. instrumentalists and artisans may exhibit developed bodily-kinesthetic intelligence. 2.1.8 Naturalistic Intelligence The following definition is an abbreviation and adaptation by J. Keith Rogers and based upon his study of Howard Gardner's theory: Naturalistic intelligence is
the ability to understand, relate to, categorize, classify, comprehend, and
explain the things encountered in the world of nature. People such as farmers, ranchers, hunters, gardeners, and animal handlers may exhibit developed naturalistic intelligence. Although the intelligences are anatomically separated from each other, Gardner claims that the seven intelligences very rarely operate independently. Rather, the intelligences are used concurrently and typically complement each other as individuals develop skills or solve problems. For example, a dancer can excel in his art only if he has 1) strong musical intelligence to understand the rhythm and variations of the music, 2) interpersonal intelligence to understand how he can inspire or emotionally move his audience through his movements, as well as 3) bodily-kinesthetic intelligence to provide him with the agility and coordination to complete the movements successfully. Basis for Intelligence Gardner argues that there is both a biological and cultural basis for the multiple intelligences. Neurobiological research indicates that learning is an outcome of the modifications in the synaptic connections between cells. Primary elements of different types of learning are found in particular areas of the brain where corresponding transformations have occurred. Thus, various types of learning results in synaptic connections in different areas of the brain. For example, injury to the Broca's area of the brain will result in the loss of one's ability to verbally communicate using proper syntax. Nevertheless,this injury will not remove the patient's understanding of correct grammar and word usage. In addition to biology, Gardner (1983) argues that culture also plays a large role in the development of the intelligences. All societies value different types of intelligences. The cultural value placed upon the ability to perform certain tasks provides the motivation to become skilled in those areas. Thus, while particular intelligences might be highly evolved in many people of one culture, those same intelligences might not be as developed in the individuals of another. 2.2. Psychological analysis of Gardner’s Theory Despite swings of the pendulum between theoretical and applied concerns, the concept of intelligence has remained central to the field of psychology. In the wake of the Darwinian revolution, when scientific psychology was just beginning, many scholars became interested in the development of intelligence across species. The late 19th and early 20th centuries were punctuated by volumes that delineated levels of intelligence across species and within the human species . Francis Galton (cousin of Charles Darwin) was perhaps the first psychologically oriented scientist to try to measure the intellect directly. Though Galton (1870) had a
theoretical interest in the concept of intelligence, his work was by no means
unrelated to practical issues. A committed eugenicist, he sought to measure
intelligence and hoped, through proper "breeding," to increase the
overall intelligence of the population. psychologists concerned themselves with the nature of human intelligence. Although a few investigators were interested principally in theoretical issues, most seasoned their concerns with a practical orientation. Thus, Binet and Terman developed the first general-purpose intelligence tests in their respective countries; Yerkes and Wechsler created their own influential instruments. Even scientists with a strong theoretical bent, like Spearman and Thurstone , contributed either directly or indirectly to the
devising of certain measurement techniques and the favoring of particular lines
of interpretation. Still, it is fair to say
that, within scientific psychology, interest in issues of intelligence waned to
some extent. Although psychometricians continued to perfect the instruments
that purported to measure human intellect and some new tests were introduced ,
for the most part, the burgeoning interest in cognitive matters bypassed the
area of intelligence. Sternberg was perhaps the most important catalyst for this shift, but researchers from a number
of different areas of psychology have joined in this rediscovery of the
centrality of intelligence . conceptualized all aspects of symbol use as part of a single "semiotic function," empirical evidence was accruing that the human mind may be quite modular in design. That is, separate psychological processes appear to be involved in dealing with linguistic, numerical, pictorial, gestural, and other kinds of symbolic systems . Individuals may be
precocious with one form of symbol use, without any necessary carryover to
other forms. By the same token, one form of symbol use may become seriously compromised
under conditions of brain damage, without correlative depreciation of other
symbolic capacities . Indeed, different forms of symbol use appear to be
subserved by different portions of the cerebral cortex. aptitude, and achievement
tests. If different kinds of items were used, or different kinds of assessment
instruments devised, a quite different view of the human intellect might issue
forth. intelligence beyond its
customary application in educational psychology, Gardner proposed the existence
of a number of relatively autonomous human intelligences. He defined
intelligence as the capacity to solve problems or to fashion products that are
valued in one or more cultural settings, and detailed a set of criteria for
what counts as a human intelligence. Problem solving is recognized as a crucial component, but the ability to fashion a productto write a symphony, execute a painting, stage a play, build up and manage an organization, carry out an experimentis not included, presumably because the aforementioned capacities cannot be probed adequately in short-answer tests. Moreover, on the canonical
account, intelligence is presumed to be a universal, probably innate, capacity,
and so the diverse kinds of roles valued in different cultures are not
considered germane to a study of "raw intellect." For the most part, definitions and tests of intelligence are empirically determined. Investigators search for items that predict who will succeed in school, even as they drop items that fail to predict scholastic success. New tests are determined in part by the degree of correlation with older, already accepted instruments. In sharp contrast, existing psychometric instruments play no role in Gardner's formulation. Rather, a candidate ability emerges as
an intelligence to the extent that it has recurred as an identifiable entity in
a number of different lines of study of human cognition. evolution of cognition across the millennia; and two forms of psychological evidencethe results of factor-analytic studies of human cognitive capacities and the outcome of studies of transfer and generalization. Candidate capacities that turned up repeatedly in these disparate literatures made up a provisional list of human intelligences, whereas
abilities that appeared only once or twice or were reconfigured differently in
diverse sources were abandoned from consideration. The methods and the results of this massive survey are reported in detail in Frames of Mind and summarized in several other publications. Gardner's provisional list includes seven intelligences, each with its own component processes and subtypes (see supplement 3). It is claimed that, as a species, human beings have evolved over the millennia to carry out at least these seven forms of thinking. In a biological metaphor, these may be thought of as different mental "organs" ; in a computational metaphor, these may be construed as separate information-processing devices . Although all humans exhibit the range of intelligences, individuals differ--presumably for both hereditary and environmental reasons--in their current profile of intelligences. Moreover, there is no
necessary correlation between any two intelligences, and they may indeed entail
quite distinct forms of perception, memory, and other psychological processes. need for a blend of
intelligences. For instance, surgeons require both the acuity of spatial
intelligence to guide the scalpel and the dexterity of the bodily/kinesthetic
intelligence to handle it. Similarly, scientists often have to depend on their
linguistic intelligence to describe and explain the discoveries made using
their logical-mathematic intelligence, and they must employ interpersonal
intelligence in interacting with colleagues and in maintaining a productive and
smoothly functioning laboratory. admittedly from the perspective of the Theory of Multiple Intelligences (hereafter MI Theory). Since the publication of Frames of Mind , they and their colleagues have been involved in investigating its implications. On the one hand, we seek to determine the scientific adequacy of the theory . On the other hand, in their view, a principal value of the multiple intelligence perspectivebe it a theory or a "mere" frameworklies in its potential contributions to educational reform. In both cases, progress seems to revolve around assessment. To demonstrate that the intelligences are relatively independent of one another and that
individuals have distinct profiles of intelligences, assessments of each
intelligence have to be developed. To take advantage of students' multiple
intelligences, there must be some way to identify their strengths and
weaknesses reliably. their efforts to assess
individual intelligences at different age levels. In addition, they report some
preliminary findings from one of their projects and their implications for the
confirmation (or disconfirmation) of MI Theory. thinking and performance that distinguish each intelligence. Although spatial problems can be approached to some degree through linguistic media (like verbal directions or word problems), intelligence-fair methods place a premium on the abilities to perceive and manipulate visual-spatial information in a direct manner. For example, the spatial intelligence of children can be assessed through a mechanical activity in which they are asked to take apart and reassemble a meat grinder. The activity requires them to "puzzle out" the structure of the object and then to discern or remember the spatial information that will allow reassembly of the pieces. Although linguistically inclined children may produce a running report about the actions they are taking, little verbal
skill is necessary (or helpful) for successful performance on such a task. the preschool level, language capacity is not assessed in terms of vocabulary, definitions, or similarities, but rather as manifest in story telling (the novelist) and reporting (the journalist). Instead of attempting to assess spatial skills in isolation, we observe children as they are drawing (the artist) or taking apart and putting together objects (the mechanic). dependent on a person's familiarity and experience with the materials and demands of the assessments. In our own work, it rapidly became clear that meaningful assessment of an intelligence was not possible if students Страницы: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Рефераты бесплатно, курсовые, дипломы, научные работы, реферат бесплатно, сочинения, курсовые работы, реферат, доклады, рефераты, рефераты скачать, рефераты на тему и многое другое. |
||
При использовании материалов - ссылка на сайт обязательна. |