The manager as a teacher: selected aspects of stimulation of scientsfsc thinking
Self-training control block. No
brain is able to hold enormous “knowledge bases” on all
possible conditions of the entire world around. Therefore, one of the reasons
why each species of animals occupies corresponding biosphere niche is the
necessity to limit the volume of “knowledge base”. Antelope knows what the seal
does not, and vice versa. In each separate ecological niche the quantity of
possible situations is much less, than in all ecological niches all together.
Therefore, relatively small volume of necessary knowledge is required in
separate ecological niches. However, if one tries to somehow input /in the
brain/ all the information currently available on all the
situations which have already been occurring in the world, it would not help
either, because the world alters continually and many situations have never
ever arose. The “knowledge base” basically may not have information on what has
not yet happened in the world. Naturally, the “base of decisions”
cannot contain all the possible options of decisions either. “Genetic
knowledge” contains only what the ancestors of animals have experienced. They
materially cannot have knowledge of what is going to happen. When new situation
arises, the system cannot identify, classify it and make decision on it. Even
if this situation will occur repeatedly, if the system is unable of
self-training it will every time fail to correctly identify a situation because
such situations are not contained in its “knowledge base”. The ant runs along
the fence, going up and down, and cannot guess that it is possible to easily
bypass the fence. Millions years ago, when its genetically input “knowledge
base” was formed the fences were non-existent. If one tries to sink a thread on
the web the spider will leave this web and will weave a new one because it is
not familiar with such situation and it does not know and cannot learn that it
is possible to make a hole in a web so that the thread does not interfere. All
this is due to the fact that insects as a class of animals are not capable of
learning anything. They may be perfect builders amazing us with their
sophisticated and fine webs, nests and other creations of their work. But they
can only build based on their innate knowledge. They do have “knowledge base”
(instincts), but they do not have cerebral structures (elements of control
block) capable of supplementing their own “knowledge base” with new existential
situations. They do not have reflexes on new stimuli/exciters/. To be able to identify
and classify new situations the control block should be able to enter the
descriptions of these situations in its “knowledge base”. But at first it
should be able to identify that it is a completely new situation, for example,
by comparing it to what already exists in its “knowledge base”. Then it should
identify the importance (the value worth) of this particular situation for the
achievement of its goal. If there is no any correlation between the new
situation and the fulfillment of the goal of the system, there is no sense in
remembering this situation, otherwise the brain “will be crammed with trash”.
By singling out and classifying external situations (identifying them) and
finding interrelation (correlation) between these situations, by decisions made
and the achievement of the goal of the system the control block learns to
develop appropriate decisions. Thus, the self-training decision-making block
continually supplements its “knowledge base” and “base of decisions”. But under
the conservation law nothing occurs by itself. In order for the control block
to be able to perform the above actions it should have appropriate elements.
The major element of the kind is the analyzer-correlator. It is the basis
whereon reflex on new stimulus/exciter or a new situation may emerge. Its task
is to detect a new situation, identify that it is new, determine the degree of
correlation between this situation and its own goal. If there is no correlation
between this new situation and implementation of the goal by the system, there
is no sense in remembering and loading its limited “database” memory. If the
degree of correlation is high it is necessary to enter this situation in the
“knowledge base” and develop a decision on the choice of own actions for the
achievement of its own goal and thereafter to define whether there is
correlation between the decision made and the achievement of the goal. If there
is no correlation between the decision made and the fulfillment of the goal by
the system it is necessary to arrive at other solution and again determine the
correlation between the decision made and the achievement of the goal. And it
should be repeated in that way until sufficiently high correlation between the
decision made and the achievement of goal is obtained. Only afterwards the
correct computed decision should be entered into the “base of decisions”. This
is the essence of self-training. Only the analyzer-correlator enables
self-training process. As a matter of fact, the system’s self-training means
the emergence of reflexes to new stimuli/exciters or situations. Consequently,
these are only possible when the control block contains analyzer-correlator.
Biological analogue of the analyzer-correlator is the cerebral cortex. The
presence of cortex determines the possibility of emergence of reflexes to new
situations. Cerebral cortex is only present in animals which represent
sufficiently high level of development. Non-biological analogues of systems
with such self-training control block are unknown to us. Computer self-training
systems are built by man and the process of self-training at the end of the day
always involves human cerebral cortex. There exist various so-called
“intellectual” systems, but full-fledged intelligence is only inherent in human
being. Let us specify that there are no self-training systems, but there are
their self-training control blocks, because executive elements cannot be
trained in anything. There may be systems with simple executive elements, but
with control blocks of varying complexity. In order for the control block to be
a self-training structure it should contain three types of analyzers: the
analyzer-informant with “database”; the analyzer-classifier with the “knowledge
base” and “base of decisions” (which is able of classifying external situation
on the basis of the information from the “C” informant); the
analyzer-correlator (able of identifying the interrelation – correlation
between various external situations and the results of
actions of the given system and transferring the knowledge obtained and
decisions to the analyzer-classifier to enter them in the “knowledge base” and
the “base of decisions”). Thus, the system with self-training control block is
an object which can learn to distinguish new external influences and situations
in which such influence may be exerted. For this purpose it has the
analyzer-correlator. In other respects it is similar to the systems with complex
control block. It can respond to specific external influence and external
situation and its reaction would be stipulated by type and number of its SFU.
The result of action of the system is also graduated. The number of gradations
is determined by the number of executive SFU in the system. It also has
analyzer-qualifier with “knowledge base” and “base of decisions” and the
analyzer-informant with “database”, DPC (the “X”
informant) and NF (the “Y” informant), which operate the system through the
stimulator (efferent paths). In inorganic/inanimate nature there are no
analogues of systems with self-training control blocks. Biological analogues of
systems with complex control block are all animals with sufficiently developed
nervous system in which it is possible to develop reflexes to new situations
(should not be confused with conditioned reflexes). The analogue of
analyzer-correlator is only the cerebral cortex.
Signaling systems. The
appearance in the control block of the analyzer-correlator enabled the
possibility to enhance its personal experience by self-training and continually
update its “knowledge base” and “base of decisions”. But it cannot transfer its
experience to other systems. Personal experience is limited howsoever an
individual would try to expand it. In any case collective experience is much
broader than that of an individual. In order for one individual to be able to
transfer his/her experience to other individual separate device is needed
enabling “downloading” the information from one “knowledge base” to another.
For example, the antelope knows that the cheetah is very dangerous because it feeds
on antelopes and wishes to transfer this knowledge to its calf. How can it be
done? For example, the antelope can simulate a situation playing a performance
in which all characters are real objects, i.e. it should expose itself to
cheetah so that the calf could see it to gain its own experience by the example
of its mum. The calf will see the situation and new reflex to new situation
will be developed and the calf will be on its guard against the cheetahs. Of
course, it is an absurd way as it does not solve the problem of survival.
Anyway, only
one out of the two antelopes will survive. So, what can be done in principle?
How one self-training system can transfer its
individual experience to other self-training system? It is necessary to
simulate a situation by making a show in which all characters are abstract
objects and replace real objects with others, which are conferred conventional
connection/link between them and the real objects (abstracting of objects).
Such abstract objects are prearranged signals. The systems “agree” (stipulate a
condition) that if such-and-such signal occurs, it will speak of something
agreed upon. It is the development of conditioned reflex that represents
replacement of real influence for abstract influence. It is a so-called first
signaling system which is based on conditioned reflexes. The appearance of
cheetah causes producing a panic sound by an antelope. Consequently such sound
is associated with the appearance of cheetah and it becomes an abstract
substitute of cheetah itself, i.e. prearranged signal. Any motional signal may
be an abstract substitute of danger, i.e. raising or dropping of tail, special
jumps, producing special sounds, mimicry, etc. These motional signals affect
the systems in the herd and based on this signal they may know about a danger
nearby. In other words, there was a replacement of real external influence by
some abstract thing associated with this object. Abstracting of real action by
its symbol (vocal, motional, etc) took place. For such abstracting the control
block needs to have an additional device – the analyzer-abstractor which should
contain the “base of abstraction” (“base of prearranged signals”). The “base of
abstraction” contains a set of descriptions of certain signals which are
perceived as conditional situations and correspond to other certain situations.
A prearranged signal is the appearance of some object or movement (situational
signal) which usually does not appear in common routine situation. The
occurrence of prearranged signal does not in itself affect in any way the
achievement of the goals by the systems. For example, raising and fluffing out
a tail does not influence in any way neither food intake, nor running, etc. But
the occurrence of a signal is connected with the occurrence of such situation
which can affect the achievement of goals by the systems. Given the ability to
abstract from concrete situations, then not even seeing a cheetah, but having
seen the lifted tails, may be conducive to guessing that a cheetah is nearby.
Abstracting of real external influence by vocal or motional symbol is performed
by the first signaling system. It supplements the
analyzer-correlator and operates similarly to it, i.e. is self-training. Unlike
the “knowledge base” the “base of abstraction” of a newly born system is empty.
It is being filled out during the system’s lifetime on account of possibility
of self-training, and the newly obtained knowledge is then downloaded in the
“knowledge base”. Sometimes behavior of animals seems to be indicative of their
possibility to transfer the information from one to another even before the
occurrence of the respective situation. For example, some lions go to an
ambush, others start driving the antelopes, so they kind of foresee the
situation. But they only know about ambush possibilities based on their own
experience. They do not have other means of transfer of such information to
their younger generation except for demonstrating this situation to them. A new
way for the development of systems (or rather their control blocks) is being
opened at this point, the way of socialization – associations of animals in
groups for the enhancement of their own experience because prearranged signals
are only intended for an information transfer from one system (subject) to
another. There are probably several levels of such analyzer-abstractor and the
degree of abstraction which may be attained by this or other subject depends on
the number of these levels. One may abstract external influences, external
situations, real objects and even process of self-training proper. But in any
case one should be able to abstract and understand abstract symbols. This is
what analyzer-abstractor does. Abstracting of real external influence, object
or situation by means of situational prearranged signal (a pose, a sound, a
movement, some kind of action) may be performed by the first signaling system.
Abstracting of real external influence, an object or a situation by means of
sign /emblematic/ prearranged signal (symbol) can only be performed by second
signaling system. Control block having the second signaling
system is an intellectual control block. Intelligence depends on the presence
and the degree of development (number of levels) of analyzer-abstractor. In
animals the second signaling system is very poorly developed or undeveloped at
all. If the horse dashes aside from a whip, it is not even the first signaling
system that works in this case, but rather a reflex on the new situation which
the horse has learnt when it first encountered a whip. If the horse is coarsely
shouted at even without showing a whip to it, it will draw necessary
conclusions. That’s the point at which the first signaling system takes effect.
But if the horse is shown an inscription which reads that it now will be
beaten, the animal will not react to in any way because it cannot and will
never be able to read since it does not have second signaling system. There are
animals which apparently are capable of speaking and understanding words,
written symbols and even making elementary arithmetic operations. But the
second signaling system is very poorly developed in them and is literally “in
embryo” condition. When the trainer demonstrates the dog’s counting up to five,
he bluffs in a way as in fact the dog picks up some motional signals from him,
i.e. the second rather than the first signaling system takes effect. The second
signaling system is developed to the utmost extent only in human beings. In
human beings it is developed to the extent that it makes it possible to
transfer all necessary information on our further actions to us in the nearest
or even quite a distant future only by means of sign symbols. We can read a
book containing just mere squiggles only, however such a full-blown and
colorful pictures are open before us that we forget about everything on earth.
Your dog for sure is surprised that its master looks for hours at a strange
subject (the book) and does not move, run or make any sounds. And even if you
try to explain to it that it is a book the dog will not understand it anyway,
because it has not yet “matured”, it does not have second signaling system.
Thus, the system with self-training control block containing the first signaling
system is an object which can abstract external influences and situations by
means of abstract situational prearranged signal. For this purpose it has an
analyzer-abstractor of the first order. But it can inform of the presence of
such action or situation only at the moment of their occurrence. It may
transfer its experience to other systems only with the help of the situational
prearranged signal which possibilities are
limited. Such block has the “knowledge base” and “base of abstraction” which it
accumulates in its brain within the lifespan. In the communities of systems
with first signaling system accumulation of personal knowledge is possible,
whereas accumulation of social knowledge is impossible because this knowledge
is accumulated only in the control block (cerebrum) which possibilities are
limited. The system which has self-training control block containing the second
signaling system is an object which can abstract external influences and
situations by means of abstract sign /symbolic/ prearranged signal. For this
purpose it has an analyzer-abstractor of Z-order. It can transfer its
experience to other systems by transfer of information to them in the form of
conventional signs. Such blocks accumulate “knowledge base” outside its
cerebrum in the form of script thanks to the developed “base of abstraction”.
It gives an opportunity to absolve from dependence of accumulation of knowledge
on the lifespan of an individual subject. In communities of systems with the
second signaling system accumulation of social knowledge is possible and it
strengthens the accumulation of individual knowledge. In other respects the
control block with signaling systems is similar to the self-training control
block examined above. It can react to definite external influence and learn to
react to new external influence and an external situation, and its reaction is
determined by type and number of its SFU. The result of action of the system is
also graduated. The number of gradations is determined by the number of
executive SFU in the system. It also has the analyzer-correlator, the
analyzer-classifier with “knowledge base” and “base of decisions”, the
analyzer-informant with the “database”, DPC (with the “Х” informant) and NF
(the “Y” informant) which through a stimulator (efferent paths) operate the
system. In an inanimate/inorganic nature there are no analogues of systems with
control block having signaling systems. Biological analogues of systems with
control block containing the first signaling system are all animals with sufficiently
developed nervous system in which conditioned reflexes may be developed. As a
rule such animals do already have social relations (flocks, herds and other
social groups), as signals are transferred from one animal to another.
Biological analogue of systems with control block containing the second
signaling system is only the human being.
Self-organizing systems. Bogdanov
has shown that there exist two modes of formation of systems. According to the
first one the system arises at least from two objects of any nature by means of
the third entity – connections (synthesis, generation). According to the second
one the system is formed at the expense of disintegration (destruction,
retrogression/degeneration) of the more complex system that previously existed
[6]. Hence, the system may be constructed (arranged) from new elements or
restructured (reorganized) at the expense of inclusion of additional elements
in its structure or by exclusion from its structure of unnecessary elements.
Apparently, there is also a third mode of reorganization of systems –
replacement of old or worn out parts for the new ones (structural
regeneration), and the fourth mode – changing of connections/bonds between
internal elements of the system (functional regeneration). Generation (the
first mode of reorganization) is a process of positive entropy (from simple to
complex, complexification of systems). New system is formed for the account of
expanding the structure of its elements. This process occurs for the account of
emergence of additional connections between the elements and consequently
requires energy and inflow of substances (new elements). The degeneration (the
second mode of reorganization) is a process of negative entropy (from complex
to simple, simplification of systems). New system is formed for the account of
reduction of compositional structure of its elements. This process releases
energy and elements from the structure. Both modes are used for the creation of
new systems with the new goals. In the first case complexification of systems
takes place, while in the second one their simplification or destruction
occurs. Structural regeneration (the third mode of reorganization) is used for
the conservation and restoration of the systems’ structure. It is used in the form
of metabolism, but at that, the system and its goals remain unchanged. Energy
and inflow of substances for the SFU restoration is required for this process.
Functional regeneration (the fourth mode of reorganization) is used for the
operation of systems as such. The principle of the systems’ functioning
resembles generation and degeneration processes. In process of accretion of
functions the system includes the next in turn SFU
ostensibly building a new, more powerful system with larger number of elements
(generation). During the reduction of capacity of functions the system
deactivates the next in turn SFU as if it means
to build a new system with fewer number of elements (degeneration). But these
are all reversible changes of the system arising in response to the external
influence which are effected for the account of the change of the condition of
its elements and the use of DPC, NF and effectors. At that, the system’s
structure kind of alters depending on its goal. New active and passive
(reserve) SFU appear in it. This process requires energy and flow of substances
for energy recovery, but not necessarily requires a flow of substances for the
restoration of SFU. How does the organization (structuring) of system occur?
Who makes decision on the organization or reorganization of systems? Who builds
control block of the new or reorganized system? Who gives the command, the task
for the system? Why is the NF loop built for meeting the given specific
condition? Before we try to answer these questions, we will note the following.
First, there is a need in the presence of someone or something “interested” in
the new quality of the result of action who (or which) will determine this
condition (set the goal) and construct the control block. Someone or something
“interested” may be the case coupled with natural
selection, whereby by way of extensive arbitrary search corresponding
combinations of elements and their interactions may emerge that are the most
sustained/lasting in the given conditions of environment. Thus, the
environment/medium sets condition and the incident builds the systems under
these conditions. At this point we do not consider the conditions in which
generation or degeneration occurs and which are associated
with redundancy or lack of energy (with positive or negative entropy). We only
consider the need and expediency of creation of systems. The more complicated
the system is, the more search options should be available and the more time it
takes (the law of large numbers). We will note, however, that the goal is set
to any systems from the outside, whether it is an incident, a person, natural
selection or something else. But we cannot ignore the following very
interesting consequence. Firstly, the survival rate is
the main and general goal of any living organism. And as far as the goal is set
from the outside, the survival rate is also something set to us from the
outside and is not something that stems from our internal inspirations. In
other words, the aim to survive is our internal incentive, but someone or
something from the outside has once imbedded it in us. And prior to such
imbedding it was not “ours”. Secondly, in order to ensure the possibility of
building systems with any kind of control block, even the elementary one, the
presence of such elements is necessary which quality of
results of actions could in principle provide such
a possibility. It follows from the conservation law and the law of
cause-and-effect limitations that nothing occurs by itself. These elements
should have entry points of external influence (necessarily), command entry
points (not necessarily for uncontrollable SFU) and exit points of the result
of action (necessarily). Exits and entries should have possibility to interact
between themselves. This possibility is realized by means of combination of
homo-reactivity and hetero-reactivity of elements. Physical homo-reactivity is
the ability of an element to produce the same kind of result of action as is
the kind of external influence (pressure → pressure, electricity → electricity,
etc.). At the same time, characteristics of physical parameters do not vary
(10g →10g, 5mV → 5mV, etc.). Homo-reactive elements are
transmitters of actions. Physical hetero-reactivity is the ability of an
element, in response to external influence of one physical nature, to yield the
result of action of other physical nature (pressure → electric pulse
frequency, electric current → axis shaft rotation, etc.). Hetero-reactive
elements are converters of actions. The elements with physical hetero-reactivity
are, for example, all receptors of living organism (which transform the signals
of measurable parameters into nerve pulse trains), sensors of measuring
devices, levers, shafts, planes, etc. In other words such elements may be any
material things of the world around us that satisfy hetero-reactivity
condition. Chemical reactions also fall under the subcategory of physical
reactions as chemical reactions represent transfer of electrons from one group
of atoms to others. Chemistry is a special section of physics. Logic
hetero-reactivity is the ability of an element, in response to external
influence of one type physical nature, to yield the result of action of the
same physical nature (pressure → pressure, electric current →
electric current, etc.), but with other characteristics (10g → 100g, 5mA →
0.5mA, 1Hz → 10Hz, 5 impulses → 15 impulses, etc.). Amplifiers,
code converters, logic components of electronics are the examples of elements
with logic hetero-reactivity. Neurons do not possess physical hetero-reactivity
as they can perceive only potentials of action and generate the potentials. But
they have logic hetero-reactivity and they can transform frequency and pulse
count. They do not transform a physical parameter as such, but its
characteristics. Any system consists of executive and operating elements. At
the same time any control block of any system itself consists of some kind of
parts (elements), so it also falls under the definition of systems. In other
words, control block and its parts are specific systems (subsystems) themselves
with their goals, and they have their own executive elements and local control
blocks operating these executive elements. Compulsory condition for part of
them is their ability to hetero-reactivity of one or other sort. The effect of
their control action consists only in their relative positioning. Command is
entered into the local control block (condition of the task, the
goal/objective) and the latter continually watches that the result of action always
satisfies the command. At that, the command can be set from the outside by
other system external in relation to the given one, or the self-training block
may “decide” independently to change the parameters (but
not the goal) set by the command. So, the elements of control may be the same
as the executive elements. The difference is only in relative positioning.
Director of an enterprise is just the same kind of individual as any ordinary
engineer. All elements of the system, both executive and controlling, are
structured according to a certain scheme specific for each concrete case (for
each specific goal), but all of them must have the “exit” point/outlet/, whence
the result of action of the given element is produced, and two “entry points” –
for external influence and for entry of the command. If the exit points of any
elements are connected to the entry points for external influences of other
elements, such elements are executive. In this case executive elements are
converters of one kind of results of action into the other, because the results
of actions of donor systems represent external influence for the recipient
systems (executive elements). They (external influences) ostensibly enter the
system and exit it being already transformed into the form of new results of
action. If exit points of elements are connected to command
entry points of other elements, such elements are controlling and represent a
part
of
control block. In such cases the result of action of some systems represents the
command for the executive elements, the instruction on how to transform the
results of action of donor systems into the results of
action of recipient systems. But the law of homogeneity of actions and
homogeneous interactivity (homo-reactivity) of the exit-entry connection is
invariably observed. If, for example, the result of action of the donor element
is pressure, the entry point of external influence (for the command) of the
recipient element should be able to react to pressure, or otherwise the
interaction between the elements would be impossible.
Рефераты бесплатно, курсовые, дипломы, научные работы, реферат бесплатно, сочинения, курсовые работы, реферат, доклады, рефераты, рефераты скачать, рефераты на тему и многое другое.